Skip to main content

EU gender quota a 'historic step'

Benjamin child G We0dl VD9e0 unsplash

This week, the EU agreed a ‘landmark’ 40% quota for women on corporate boards. Not only is this target legally binding for EU companies, but they could also be fined for failing to recruit enough women to their non-executive boards and see board appointments cancelled for non-compliance with the law.

Two important points to discuss about the EU decision are:

• the set figure of 40% for the gender quota for non-executive directors;

• the additional requirement of a 33% target for women in all senior roles, including executive directors, such as CEOs and COOs.

40% of women in non-executive director roles is an important target because both anecdotal evidence and empirical research have long stressed the importance for women to reach a ‘critical-mass’ in order to be effective voices in corporate boards (that critical mass has been estimated around 30% - so the 40% would exceed the minimal threshold).

Yet the 33% target for women in all senior roles is an even more important quota because - while some improvement in corporate board gender diversity have been steadily recorded over time in the UK and EU countries for non-executive roles - the number of senior executive roles taken up by women has been stagnant.

This has led to accusations of a 'tokenistic' approach by firms. They have been accused of only including women in corporate boards simply to fulfil diversity requirements under the heightened social and political pressure of minority inclusion in the workplace. It has been said they are simply trying to gain more legitimacy with the public, and promote their image as being open and diverse.

In reality, very often the ‘token women leaders’ end up facing challenges, such heightened scrutiny, exaggerated stereotypes, negative evaluation bias, lower status and less influence than members of the majority (men). These challenges inhibit their ability to pursue differential strategies and bring on the additional value that comes from their background and experience.

We need more effective leadership from women and a real shift of power to rebalance the inequity we still witness in the corporate world. This decision by the EU is therefore a historic step in the right direction.

Dr Miriam Marra

Associate Professor of Finance

You might also like

Jacinda Ardern has shown leaders how it's done

19 January 2023
Following the news that New Zealand PM Jacinda Ardern will be stepping down next month, Dr Miriam Marra offers hers thoughts on the legacy the often divisive leader will leave.
Leading insights Equity, Diversity and Inclusion

Just in Time or Just in Case?

1 October 2021
Do we need to rethink how we supply the things we buy? Professor Adrian Palmer discusses the reliability of Just in Time and Just in Case supply chains.
Leading insights

European Perspectives: A new trade bloc in the making?

5 November 2020
In the first article in our new European Perspectives series, Dr Stefan Schepers discusses the proposed partnership between the European Union and the African Union.
Leading insights